This database tracks legal decisions1
I.e., all documents where the use of AI, whether established or merely alleged, is addressed in more than a passing reference by the court or tribunal.
Notably, this does not cover mere allegations of hallucinations, but only cases where the court or tribunal has explicitly found (or implied) that a party relied on hallucinated content or material.
As an exception, the database also covers some judicial decisions where AI use was alleged but not confirmed. This is a judgment call on my part.
in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content – typically fake citations, but also other types of AI-generated arguments. It does not track the (necessarily wider) universe of all fake citations or use of AI in court filings.
While seeking to be exhaustive (594 cases identified so far), it is a work in progress and will expand as new examples emerge. This database has been featured in news media, and indeed in several decisions dealing with hallucinated material.2
Examples of media coverage include:
- M. Hiltzik, AI 'hallucinations' are a growing problem for the legal profession (LA Times, 22 May 2025)
- E. Volokh, "AI Hallucination Cases," from Courts All Over the World (Volokh Conspiracy, 18 May 2025)
- J-.M. Manach, "Il génère des plaidoiries par IA, et en recense 160 ayant « halluciné » depuis 2023" (Next, 1 July 2025)
- J. Koebler & J. Roscoe, "18 Lawyers Caught Using AI Explain Why They Did It (404 Media, 30 September 2025)
If you know of a case that should be included, feel free to contact me.3 (Readers may also be interested in this project regarding AI use in academic papers.)
Based on this database, I have developped an automated reference checker that also detects hallucinations: PelAIkan. Check the Reports
in the database for examples, and reach out to me for a demo !
For weekly takes on cases like these, and what they mean for legal practice, subscribe to Artificial Authority.
| Case | Court / Jurisdiction | Date ▼ | Party Using AI | AI Tool ⓘ | Nature of Hallucination | Outcome / Sanction | Monetary Penalty | Details | Report(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. | N.D. Illinois (USA) | 4 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(4)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC | SC New York (USA) | 4 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
False Quotes
Case Law
(1)
|
Costs Order | — | — | |
| United States v. Brian Boehm | M.D. Pennsylvania (USA) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Ordered disclosure of AI use and affidavit certifying accuracy of citations for future filings | — | — | |
|
"12) The Al tool possibly used was sophisticated enough to include pinpoint citations to precedential Third Circuit authority. |
|||||||||
| Rashonna Moore v. City of Del City | CA Tenth Circuit (USA) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(2)
|
District court judgment affirmed; alternatively appeal dismissed as a sanction for misuse of GenAI; Future disclosure of GenAI use and verification of citations ordered, under penalty of perjury. | — | — | |
| Taiwo v Homelets of Bath Limited | High Court (UK) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
|
Adverse Costs Order | 1 | — | |
| Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. | D. Guam (USA) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(3)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Farrow v. John Does | E.D. New York (USA) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(3)
|
— | — | ||
|
Source: Jesse Schaefer
|
|||||||||
| Saregama India Ltd. v. Bharath Aiyer, et al. | S.D. New York (USA) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1),
Legal Norm
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| N° 2509827 | TA Grenoble (France) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al. | Supreme Court (Israel) | 3 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Monetary Sanction | 500 ILS | — | |
| Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 | BC CRT (Canada) | 2 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(3)
|
— | — | ||
| Jarrus et al. v. Governor of Michigan et al. | E.D. Michigan (USA) | 2 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | ChatGPT Plus |
Misrepresented
Case Law
(2)
Outdated Advice
Repealed Law
(1)
|
Monetary sanctions | 1 | — | |
|
"[T]he fact that Plaintiffs … did not "fabricate cases or cite nonexistent decisions" is of no help. When a case cite is "real," an attorney, or for that matter a judge, might see a case they recognize and assume the quote or holding has been accurately represented. That problem is illustrated here; although Chat GPT generated "holdings" that looked like they could plausibly have appeared in the cited cases, in fact it overstated their holdings to a significant degree. And while a litigant might get away with similar overstatements because they could, perhaps, reason their way to showing how a case's stated holding might extend to novel situations, an LLM does not reason in the way a litigant must. To put it in a slightly different way, LLMs do not perform the metacognitive processes that are necessary to comply with Rule 11. LLMs are tools that "emulate the communicative function of language, not the separate and distinct cognitive process of thinking and reasoning." When an LLM overstates a holding of a case, it is not because it made a mistake when logically working through how that case might represent a "nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;" it is just piecing together a plausible-looking sentence—one whose content may or may not be true." Court later declined to reconsider this decision (see here). |
|||||||||
| In re: Avi Schwalb | D. Colorado (Bankruptcy) (USA) | 2 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Court rejected reliance on the citation | — | — | |
| Magee v. New Balance Athletics, Inc. | E.D. Arkansas (USA) | 2 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Brief Stricken; Order to Show Cause | — | — | |
| A'Vard v Mornington Peninsula SC | Victorian CAT (Australia) | 2 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
|
— | — | ||
| Brick v. Gallatin County, et al. | D. Montana (USA) | 1 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
|
Plaintiff repeatedly cited non-existent or misleading authorities in her Fourth Amended Complaint. The Court identified at least one fabricated citation and several mischaracterized cases, noting these failures to comply with Rule 8 and prior court instruction, and relied on the deficient pleadings in granting dismissal. |
|||||||||
| Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass | M.D. Florida (USA) | 1 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Kingdom of Sweden v. Samantha Ashhadi Soliman | CA California (USA) | 1 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Legal Norm
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(2),
Legal Norm
(1)
|
Admonishment | — | — | |
|
Source: Jesse Schaefer
|
|||||||||
| Lothamer Tax Resolution, Inc. v. Paul Kimmel (2) | W.D. Michigan (USA) | 1 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(3)
False Quotes
Case Law
(4)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(5)
|
Monetary Sanction | — | — | |
|
Show Cause Order is here. |
|||||||||
| John Doe v. James P. Ehrhard, Esq. | S.D. New York (USA) | 1 December 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al. | D. Colorado (USA) | 28 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(5)
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(4),
Legal Norm
(1)
|
Struck Filing; Order for future filings to include certificate; Required contact with the Federal Pro Se Clinic | — | — | |
|
Order to Show Cause is here. |
|||||||||
| Obermann v. Spring Financial Inc. | BC CRT (Canada) | 28 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Legal Norm
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center | S.D. Illinois (USA) | 26 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al. | S.D. New York (USA) | 26 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use | — | — | |
|
Source: Jesse Schaefer
|
|||||||||
| Lessard c. Longuépée | Québec (Canada) | 26 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | ChatGPT |
Fabricated
Case Law
(4)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. | D. New Mexico (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(3)
|
Costs Order | 1 USD | — | |
| Brian Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | N.D. Mississippi (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC (1) | N.D. California (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Order to include a footnote reading 'Located through AI; Checked' for each future citation | — | — | |
| Jane Doe v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. | N.D. California (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
|
Show Cause Order | — | — | |
| Jesse Andre v. Warden, FCI Danbury | D. Connecticut (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(3),
Legal Norm
(1)
|
Admonishment; Motion stricken with prejudice | — | — | |
| South Central Ohio Job and Family Services v. Corey Mason | CA Ohio (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
|
Source: Jesse Schaefer
|
|||||||||
| In re T.F., P.F., and S.S. Minor Children | CA Ohio (USA) | 25 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(5)
False Quotes
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(3)
|
— | — | ||
|
Source: Jesse Schaefer
|
|||||||||
| Supplying Demand, LLC (Matter of) | U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| M.H. v. C.S. | CA Indiana (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. | S.D. New York (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se | — | — | |
| David Morris Clayman v. Scott Bessant | S.D. Florida (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| In re: Marguerite Latete Kilpatrick | S.D. Ohio (Bankruptcy) (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Bryan Pletcher v. Village of Libertyville Police Pension Board | CA Illinois (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(10)
False Quotes
Case Law
(11)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1),
Exhibits or Submissions
(1)
|
Plaintiff's appellate brief stricken and appeal dismissed; sanctions motion granted | — | — | |
| Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth Borough Council | Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UK) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
False Quotes
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Yakov Magdalasov v. ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc., and Maria Malvar | S.D. New York (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1),
Exhibits or Submissions
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Pletcher v. Village of Libertyville Police Pension Board | AC Illinois (USA) | 24 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(5),
Exhibits or Submissions
(1)
False Quotes
Case Law
(6)
|
Plaintiff's appellate brief stricken and appeal dismissed | — | — | |
| Linda Oliver v. Christian Dribusch | United States District Court, Northern District of New York (USA) | 21 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Walker v. Collingwood General and Marine Hospital | Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (Canada) | 21 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(2)
|
Request for Reconsideration denied | — | — | |
| Morris Gafni v. Rapid Foreclosure Refunds et al. | SC New York (USA) | 21 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited | N.D. Ohio (USA) | 21 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| Mark Jennings v NatWest Group PLC | Sheriff Appeal Court (UK) | 21 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | ChatGPT |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
— | — | ||
| Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3) | E.D. Michigan (USA) | 20 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(9)
False Quotes
Case Law
(5)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges | — | — | |
|
Show Cause Order is here. |
|||||||||
|
Source: Volokh
|
|||||||||
| Y.S. v. John Doe et al. | D. Colorado (USA) | 19 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(3)
|
Warning | — | — | |
| DJ v SN | CA Alberta (Canada) | 19 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Unidentified |
Fabricated
Case Law
(1)
|
Additional Costs | 500 CAD | — | |
| Moorehead v. Goodwill Industries of Northeast Texas | E.D. Texas (USA) | 18 November 2025 | Pro Se Litigant | Implied |
Fabricated
Case Law
(2)
Misrepresented
Case Law
(1)
|
Warning | — | — | |