AI Hallucination Cases

This database tracks legal decisions1 I.e., all documents where the use of AI, whether established or merely alleged, is addressed in more than a passing reference by the court or tribunal.

Notably, this does not cover mere allegations of hallucinations, but only cases where the court or tribunal has explicitly found (or implied) that a party relied on hallucinated content or material.

As an exception, the database also covers some judicial decisions where AI use was alleged but not confirmed. This is a judgment call on my part.
in cases where generative AI produced hallucinated content – typically fake citations, but also other types of AI-generated arguments. It does not track the (necessarily wider) universe of all fake citations or use of AI in court filings.

While seeking to be exhaustive (594 cases identified so far), it is a work in progress and will expand as new examples emerge. This database has been featured in news media, and indeed in several decisions dealing with hallucinated material.2 Examples of media coverage include:
- M. Hiltzik, AI 'hallucinations' are a growing problem for the legal profession (LA Times, 22 May 2025)
- E. Volokh, "AI Hallucination Cases," from Courts All Over the World (Volokh Conspiracy, 18 May 2025)
- J-.M. Manach, "Il génère des plaidoiries par IA, et en recense 160 ayant « halluciné » depuis 2023" (Next, 1 July 2025) - J. Koebler & J. Roscoe, "18 Lawyers Caught Using AI Explain Why They Did It (404 Media, 30 September 2025)

If you know of a case that should be included, feel free to contact me.3 (Readers may also be interested in this project regarding AI use in academic papers.)

Based on this database, I have developped an automated reference checker that also detects hallucinations: PelAIkan. Check the Reports Report icon in the database for examples, and reach out to me for a demo !

For weekly takes on cases like these, and what they mean for legal practice, subscribe to Artificial Authority.

State
Party
Nature – Category
Nature – Subcategory

Case Court / Jurisdiction Date ▼ Party Using AI AI Tool Nature of Hallucination Outcome / Sanction Monetary Penalty Details Report(s)
Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. N.D. Illinois (USA) 4 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (4)
Warning
Hilpert v. 16 Judge SPV LLC SC New York (USA) 4 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
False Quotes Case Law (1)
Costs Order
United States v. Brian Boehm M.D. Pennsylvania (USA) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Ordered disclosure of AI use and affidavit certifying accuracy of citations for future filings

"12) The Al tool possibly used was sophisticated enough to include pinpoint citations to precedential Third Circuit authority.
13) Fortunately for Boehm , the cases cited in his motion are very real decisions by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.
14) Unfortunately for Boehm, these cases are misrepresented in his motion and his motion also contains false quotations from these opinions."

Rashonna Moore v. City of Del City CA Tenth Circuit (USA) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (2)
District court judgment affirmed; alternatively appeal dismissed as a sanction for misuse of GenAI; Future disclosure of GenAI use and verification of citations ordered, under penalty of perjury.
Taiwo v Homelets of Bath Limited High Court (UK) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Adverse Costs Order 1
Eddie Lawrence Quitugua v. Donna P. Quitugua, et al. D. Guam (USA) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (3)
Warning
Farrow v. John Does E.D. New York (USA) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (3)
Source: Jesse Schaefer
Saregama India Ltd. v. Bharath Aiyer, et al. S.D. New York (USA) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1), Legal Norm (1)
N° 2509827 TA Grenoble (France) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Husni Al Qawasmi Association et al. v. Ziad Oweisat (Sharfi) et al. Supreme Court (Israel) 3 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Monetary Sanction 500 ILS
Heneghan v. The Owners, Strata Plan 187 BC CRT (Canada) 2 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (3)
Jarrus et al. v. Governor of Michigan et al. E.D. Michigan (USA) 2 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant ChatGPT Plus
Misrepresented Case Law (2)
Outdated Advice Repealed Law (1)
Monetary sanctions 1

"[T]he fact that Plaintiffs … did not "fabricate cases or cite nonexistent decisions" is of no help. When a case cite is "real," an attorney, or for that matter a judge, might see a case they recognize and assume the quote or holding has been accurately represented. That problem is illustrated here; although Chat GPT generated "holdings" that looked like they could plausibly have appeared in the cited cases, in fact it overstated their holdings to a significant degree. And while a litigant might get away with similar overstatements because they could, perhaps, reason their way to showing how a case's stated holding might extend to novel situations, an LLM does not reason in the way a litigant must.

To put it in a slightly different way, LLMs do not perform the metacognitive processes that are necessary to comply with Rule 11. LLMs are tools that "emulate the communicative function of language, not the separate and distinct cognitive process of thinking and reasoning." When an LLM overstates a holding of a case, it is not because it made a mistake when logically working through how that case might represent a "nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law;" it is just piecing together a plausible-looking sentence—one whose content may or may not be true."

Court later declined to reconsider this decision (see here).

In re: Avi Schwalb D. Colorado (Bankruptcy) (USA) 2 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Court rejected reliance on the citation
Magee v. New Balance Athletics, Inc. E.D. Arkansas (USA) 2 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Brief Stricken; Order to Show Cause
A'Vard v Mornington Peninsula SC Victorian CAT (Australia) 2 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Brick v. Gallatin County, et al. D. Montana (USA) 1 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)

Plaintiff repeatedly cited non-existent or misleading authorities in her Fourth Amended Complaint. The Court identified at least one fabricated citation and several mischaracterized cases, noting these failures to comply with Rule 8 and prior court instruction, and relied on the deficient pleadings in granting dismissal.

Ali Taj Bey v. Mark Glass M.D. Florida (USA) 1 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Kingdom of Sweden v. Samantha Ashhadi Soliman CA California (USA) 1 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Legal Norm (1)
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (2), Legal Norm (1)
Admonishment
Source: Jesse Schaefer
Lothamer Tax Resolution, Inc. v. Paul Kimmel (2) W.D. Michigan (USA) 1 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (3)
False Quotes Case Law (4)
Misrepresented Case Law (5)
Monetary Sanction

Show Cause Order is here.

John Doe v. James P. Ehrhard, Esq. S.D. New York (USA) 1 December 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Hanson v. Nest Home Lending, LLC et al. D. Colorado (USA) 28 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (5)
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (4), Legal Norm (1)
Struck Filing; Order for future filings to include certificate; Required contact with the Federal Pro Se Clinic

Order to Show Cause is here.

Obermann v. Spring Financial Inc. BC CRT (Canada) 28 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Legal Norm (1)
Boyd v. Protestant Memorial Medical Center S.D. Illinois (USA) 26 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Warning
Tameer Peak v. Onika Tanya Maraj-Petty, et al. S.D. New York (USA) 26 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Plaintiff cautioned to disclose and verify any AI use
Source: Jesse Schaefer
Lessard c. Longuépée Québec (Canada) 26 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant ChatGPT
Fabricated Case Law (4)
Warning
Carlos Maturin v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. D. New Mexico (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (3)
Costs Order 1 USD
Brian Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. N.D. Mississippi (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Sebastian Rako v. VMware LLC (1) N.D. California (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Order to include a footnote reading 'Located through AI; Checked' for each future citation
Jane Doe v. Taro Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. N.D. California (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Show Cause Order
Jesse Andre v. Warden, FCI Danbury D. Connecticut (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (1)
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (3), Legal Norm (1)
Admonishment; Motion stricken with prejudice
South Central Ohio Job and Family Services v. Corey Mason CA Ohio (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Source: Jesse Schaefer
In re T.F., P.F., and S.S. Minor Children CA Ohio (USA) 25 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (5)
False Quotes Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (3)
Source: Jesse Schaefer
Supplying Demand, LLC (Matter of) U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
M.H. v. C.S. CA Indiana (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Zero Point MGMT v. Chase Bank/JP Morgan Chase Co. S.D. New York (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Non-lawyer trustee barred from proceeding pro se
David Morris Clayman v. Scott Bessant S.D. Florida (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
In re: Marguerite Latete Kilpatrick S.D. Ohio (Bankruptcy) (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Bryan Pletcher v. Village of Libertyville Police Pension Board CA Illinois (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (10)
False Quotes Case Law (11)
Misrepresented Case Law (1), Exhibits or Submissions (1)
Plaintiff's appellate brief stricken and appeal dismissed; sanctions motion granted
Oxford Hotel Investments Ltd v Great Yarmouth Borough Council Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) (UK) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
False Quotes Case Law (1)
Yakov Magdalasov v. ByteDance Inc., TikTok Inc., and Maria Malvar S.D. New York (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (1), Exhibits or Submissions (1)
Pletcher v. Village of Libertyville Police Pension Board AC Illinois (USA) 24 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (5), Exhibits or Submissions (1)
False Quotes Case Law (6)
Plaintiff's appellate brief stricken and appeal dismissed
Linda Oliver v. Christian Dribusch United States District Court, Northern District of New York (USA) 21 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Walker v. Collingwood General and Marine Hospital Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (Canada) 21 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Misrepresented Case Law (2)
Request for Reconsideration denied
Morris Gafni v. Rapid Foreclosure Refunds et al. SC New York (USA) 21 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited N.D. Ohio (USA) 21 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Warning
Mark Jennings v NatWest Group PLC Sheriff Appeal Court (UK) 21 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant ChatGPT
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Evans, et al. v. Robertson et al. (3) E.D. Michigan (USA) 20 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (9)
False Quotes Case Law (5)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Multiple filings stricken from the record; Revocation of online upload privileges

Show Cause Order is here.

Source: Volokh
Y.S. v. John Doe et al. D. Colorado (USA) 19 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (3)
Warning
DJ v SN CA Alberta (Canada) 19 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Unidentified
Fabricated Case Law (1)
Additional Costs 500 CAD
Moorehead v. Goodwill Industries of Northeast Texas E.D. Texas (USA) 18 November 2025 Pro Se Litigant Implied
Fabricated Case Law (2)
Misrepresented Case Law (1)
Warning